So I got a comment on my first post
What is University Nudes
Grushenka said...
I suppose you imagine yourself some kind of artist simply because your subjects are unclothed. But, what about your concept demonstrates any understanding of art history, the purposes of art, indeed, any intelligence whatsoever? As far as I can tell, nothing.
You are one of a large group, those who consider themselves "artists" but are completely contrived in their ideas of what art is. You're not contributing anything. I suppose you think you are. I challenge you, what is your purpose? Write a post about it, I dare you.
Monday, September 21, 2009 12:39:00 PM CDT
Grushenka said...
And of course you won't approve my comment, because to do so would challenge your ego. Pathetic. But go ahead, prove me wrong.
Monday, September 21, 2009 12:40:00 PM CDT
Grushenka, wow. Where do I begin?
First you're commenting almost anonymously. I have no idea if Grushenka is your first, last, or any part of your name at all. Your blogger profile is non existent so I don't know if you have a blog, website, or any experience about that which you commented. Because of this I'm less likely to put any stock in what you have to say.
But let's go through your comments anyway, it'll be fun.
I suppose you imagine yourself some kind of artist simply because your subjects are unclothed.
I never mentioned art or being an artist in any of my posts. I don't call myself an artist. I'm a photographer. Some of my photographs may be artistic. Some people might call them art (obviously not you). Nudes are not the only type of photography I do, but it is the only type that will be showing up on this particular blog.
But, what about your concept demonstrates any understanding of art history, the purposes of art, indeed, any intelligence whatsoever? As far as I can tell, nothing.
Now on this point you're pretty close. I have no formal training in art history or the purposes of art. For that matter I have no formal training in photography. The last visual arts instruction I had was probably in elementary school. So what? I create photography that I like to look at. I enjoy the process and the final result. And that last part, where you insult my intelligence, that's just mean.
You are one of a large group, those who consider themselves "artists" but are completely contrived in their ideas of what art is. You're not contributing anything. I suppose you think you are.
See my comments above about artists. I do think I am contributing something. I am creating images that have never been seen before. Some of them are good, some are bad, but they're all unique. I'd like to think that what I do might change the world but I don't think it's a very realistic goal. I know I have made images that other people have liked, and those people have thanked me.
I challenge you, what is your purpose? Write a post about it, I dare you.
I don't need a whole post. My purpose is to create images that I want to look at. Nothing fancy. I don't need to "understand the dynamics of nature" or "focus on the beauty hidden in the soul", or "show the struggle of the individual against the universe." All quotes from actual artist statements by the way.
Then one minute after posting the first comment Grushenka left this one:
And of course you won't approve my comment, because to do so would challenge your ego. Pathetic. But go ahead, prove me wrong.
Since this is the first time that he or she has ever commented on anything I've posted I don't know where he or she got the idea that I wouldn't approve the comment.
Does anyone else get the impression that Grushenka is just angry? Anyway, sorry to not post any pictures with this post. I hope to have some up in a few days of Jason that I shot on Sunday.